On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 11:06 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 08/04/2024 10:01, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> >>> +
> >>> +anyOf:
> >>> + - required:
> >>> + - spdif-in
> >>> + - required:
> >>> + - spdif-out
> >>> + - required:
> >>> + - spdif-out
> >>> + - spdif-in
> >>
> >> Do you need the last required block?
> >
> > Yes, one of them or both are required.
>
> And? It's already there: that's the meaning of any. It is not oneOf...
> Before answering please test your changes and ideas. I pointed issue
> here and you responded just to close my comment. That does not make me
> happy, just wastes my time.
Maybe I didn't express clearly.
we need at least one of them (spdif-in, spdif-out) in the node. which means
that we need to select "spdif-in", or "spdif-out", or "spdif-in and
spdif-out".
So my understanding is that need to use "anyOf", if it is wrong, please let
me know.
>
> >
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> +additionalProperties: false
> >>> +
> >>> +examples:
> >>> + - |
> >>> + sound {
> >>
> >> That's a random change...
So I can use "sound-spdif", right?
best regards
wang shengjiu
> >>
> >> Instead of sending two patches per day, please carefully address the
> >> feedback.
> >
> > In v1 you suggest to change it to spdif? but spdif may conflict
> > with the fsl,spdif.yaml. so which name I should use?
>
> I don't understand where is the conflict. That's a different binding.
>
>
