Hi Conor, Thanks for the reviews. On Wed, 2024-04-03 at 16:46 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 06:25:54PM +0800, Shawn Sung wrote: > > From: "Jason-JH.Lin" <jason-jh.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Add mboxes to define a GCE loopping thread as a secure irq handler. > > This property is only required if CMDQ secure driver is supported. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Hsiao Chien Sung <shawn.sung@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce-mailbox.yaml | 10 > > ++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce- > > mailbox.yaml > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce- > > mailbox.yaml > > index cef9d76013985..c0d80cc770899 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce- > > mailbox.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce- > > mailbox.yaml > > @@ -49,6 +49,16 @@ properties: > > items: > > - const: gce > > > > + mediatek,gce-events: > > + description: > > + The event id which is mapping to the specific hardware event > > signal > > + to gce. The event id is defined in the gce header > > + include/dt-bindings/gce/<chip>-gce.h of each chips. > > Missing any info here about when this should be used, hint - you have > it > in the commit message. > > > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-arrayi > > Why is the ID used by the CMDQ service not fixed for each SoC? > I forgot to sync with Shawn about this: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240124011459.12204-1-jason- jh.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx I'll fix it at the next version. Regards, Jason-JH.Lin > Cheers, > Conor