Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] clk: iproc: add initial common clock support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 02/04/15 15:33, Ray Jui wrote:
>
> On 2/4/2015 3:13 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 02/03/15 10:33, Ray Jui wrote:
>>> +/*
>>> + * Get the clock rate based on name
>>> + */
>>> +static unsigned long __get_rate(const char *clk_name)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct clk *clk;
>>> +
>>> +	clk = __clk_lookup(clk_name);
>>> +	if (!clk) {
>>> +		pr_err("%s: unable to find clock by name: %s\n", __func__,
>>> +				clk_name);
>>> +		return 0;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	return clk_get_rate(clk);
>>> +}
>>> +
>> This looks like something we should be providing in the core framework.
>> Care to make it into an of_clk_get_parent_rate() API?
>>
> I would love to! Note __get_rate here is really getting the clock rate
> with a name provided. Can you be more specific on what you want? If I'm
> not mistaken, what you really want is this?
>
> unsigned long of_clk_get_parent_rate(struct device_node *np, int index);

Yes that looks good.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux