Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: display: atmel,lcdc: convert to dtschema

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 28/02/24 3:53 pm, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On 28/02/2024 11:18, Dharma.B@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> On 28/02/24 12:43 pm, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>>
>>> On 28/02/2024 07:59, Dharma.B@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know what's this exactly, but if embedded display then maybe
>>>>> could be part of this device node. If some other display, then maybe you
>>>>> need another schema, with compatible? But first I would check how others
>>>>> are doing this.
>>>>
>>>> Okay, then I think the driver also needs to be modified, currently the
>>>> driver parses the phandle and looks for these properties. Also the
>>>> corresponding dts files.
>>>
>>> Driver does not have to be modified in my proposal. You would still have
>>> phandle.
>>
>> If I understand correctly, I could define the dt bindings as below
>>
>>     display:
>>       $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
>>       description: A phandle pointing to the display node.
>>
>>     panel:
>>       $ref: panel/panel-common.yaml#
>>       properties:
>>
> 
> So these are standard panel bindings? Then the node should live outside
> of lcdc. If current driver needs to poke inside panel and panel could be
> anything, then probably you need peripheral-props-like approach. :/

Thank you so much, so can I use something like this

   display:
     $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
     description: A phandle pointing to the display node.

patternProperties:
   "^panel":
     type: object
     properties:
       atmel,dmacon:
       atmel,lcdcon2:
       :
       :
     required:
       - atmel,dmacon
       - atmel,lcdcon2
       - atmel,guard-time
       - bits-per-pixel

     additionalProperties: false

I tested it by removing the required property in the panel node and it 
flagged it as an issue.

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

-- 
With Best Regards,
Dharma B.





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux