Hi Andy,
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 1:19 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 02:17:00PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 11:40:44AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 6:04 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > + linedisp->buf = buf ? buf : linedisp->curr;
> > > > + linedisp->num_chars = buf ? num_chars : min(num_chars, LINEDISP_DEFAULT_BUF_SZ);
> > >
> > > I think it would be safer to return an error if buf == NULL and
> > > num_chars < LINEDISP_DEFAULT_BUF_SZ.
> >
> > I think you meant >= ?
Oops, yes/
> >
> > > Else a careless driver that doesn't check linedisp->num_chars might
> > > overflow the buffer.
> >
> > Okay, check has been added.
>
> Hold on, but I have min() being called, isn't it enough?
Yes you have.
A careless driver might not use linedisp->num_chars later, but instead
just hardcode e.g. memcpy(linedisp->buf, source, LARGE_BUF_SIZE).
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
