On 13/02/2024 16:57, Christophe Kerello wrote: > > > On 2/13/24 12:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 13/02/2024 11:57, Christophe Kerello wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 2/12/24 19:33, Conor Dooley wrote: >>>> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 06:48:12PM +0100, Christophe Kerello wrote: >>>>> From: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> On STM32MP25 SOC, STM32 FMC2 memory controller is in a power domain. >>>>> Allow a single 'power-domains' entry for STM32 FMC2. >>>> >>>> This should be squashed with patch 1, since they both modify the same >>>> file and this power-domain is part of the addition of mp25 support. >>> >>> Hi Conor, >>> >>> Ok, I will squash this patch with patch 1. >>> >>>> >>>> If the mp1 doesn't have power domains, shouldn't you constrain the >>>> property to mp25 only? >>>> >>> >>> As this property is optional, I do not see the need to constrain the >>> property to MP25 only, but if you think that it should be the case, I >>> will do it. >> >> The question is: is this property valid for the old/existing variant? >> > > Hi Krzysztof, > > It is not currently valid but there is a plan to move MP1 on PSCI > OS-initiated. OK Best regards, Krzysztof
