On 2/12/24 19:33, Conor Dooley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 06:48:12PM +0100, Christophe Kerello wrote:
From: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On STM32MP25 SOC, STM32 FMC2 memory controller is in a power domain.
Allow a single 'power-domains' entry for STM32 FMC2.
This should be squashed with patch 1, since they both modify the same
file and this power-domain is part of the addition of mp25 support.
Hi Conor,
Ok, I will squash this patch with patch 1.
If the mp1 doesn't have power domains, shouldn't you constrain the
property to mp25 only?
As this property is optional, I do not see the need to constrain the
property to MP25 only, but if you think that it should be the case, I
will do it.
Regards,
Christophe Kerello.
Cheers,
Conor.
>>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../bindings/memory-controllers/st,stm32-fmc2-ebi.yaml | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/st,stm32-fmc2-ebi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/st,stm32-fmc2-ebi.yaml
index 12e6afeceffd..84ac6f50a6fc 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/st,stm32-fmc2-ebi.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/st,stm32-fmc2-ebi.yaml
@@ -36,6 +36,9 @@ properties:
resets:
maxItems: 1
+ power-domains:
+ maxItems: 1
+
"#address-cells":
const: 2
--
2.25.1
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
