On 13/02/2024 17:43, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 10:19:05AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 02:59:02PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 12/02/2024 14:43, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>>> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 02:38:27PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>>> On 12/02/2024 12:58, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: > > ... > >>>>> Anyway, binding examples should not be collection of unrelated >>>>> solutions, because then we should accept for each device schema several >>>>> other variations and combinations. >>>> >>>> Is this documented? >>> >>> Yes, writing schema says what the example is. We repeated it multiple >>> times on multiple reviews, we made multiple commits multiple times and I >>> briefly mentioned it also in my talks. >> >> While yes, this is the guidance, I think this case has provided enough >> justification to keep it. Let's move on please. > > Thank you, Rob. > > Krzysztof, can you send v2, I'll apply it to the tree? Sure. Best regards, Krzysztof
