On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 10:19:05AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 02:59:02PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 12/02/2024 14:43, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 02:38:27PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > >> On 12/02/2024 12:58, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: ... > > >> Anyway, binding examples should not be collection of unrelated > > >> solutions, because then we should accept for each device schema several > > >> other variations and combinations. > > > > > > Is this documented? > > > > Yes, writing schema says what the example is. We repeated it multiple > > times on multiple reviews, we made multiple commits multiple times and I > > briefly mentioned it also in my talks. > > While yes, this is the guidance, I think this case has provided enough > justification to keep it. Let's move on please. Thank you, Rob. Krzysztof, can you send v2, I'll apply it to the tree? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
