On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 02:59:02PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 12/02/2024 14:43, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 02:38:27PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 12/02/2024 12:58, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: > > > > ... > > > >> Anyway, binding examples should not be collection of unrelated > >> solutions, because then we should accept for each device schema several > >> other variations and combinations. > > > > Is this documented? > > Yes, writing schema says what the example is. We repeated it multiple > times on multiple reviews, we made multiple commits multiple times and I > briefly mentioned it also in my talks. While yes, this is the guidance, I think this case has provided enough justification to keep it. Let's move on please. Rob
