On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 04:23:36AM +0000, Dharma.B@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On 12/02/24 7:38 pm, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 03:31:22PM +0530, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote: > >> + atmel,external-irqs: > >> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array > >> + description: u32 array of external irqs. > > > > Constraints on the array size and/or entry values? > > The hardware's support for external IRQs may differ, which is why a u32 > array is utilized. This choice is based on the fact that IRQ numbers are > commonly expressed as integers, and a 32-bit unsigned integer provides a > standardized size capable of representing a broad range of numbers. This > size is more than adequate for accommodating IRQ numbering. I don't think Rob was questioning your use of u32s, but rather the fact that you do not limit the values at all nor the number of values.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
