Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] dt-bindings: usb/ti,am62-usb.yaml: Add PHY2 register space

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 02/02/2024 11:53, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 11:36:55AM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 01/02/2024 21:13, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 12:35:22PM -0600, Bin Liu wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 06:18:05PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 06:15:20PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 02:03:31PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>>>>>> So far this was not required but due to the newly identified
>>>>>>> Errata i2409 [1] we need to poke this register space.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] https://www.ti.com/lit/er/sprz487d/sprz487d.pdf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually, where is the user for this that actually pokes the register
>>>>> space?
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240201121220.5523-5-rogerq@xxxxxxxxxx/
>>
>>>>> You're adding another register region, so I went to check how you were
>>>>> handling that in drivers, but there's no driver patch.
>>>>
>>>> See Roger's another patch set 'Add workaround for Errata i2409' posted
>>>> on 16th.
>>>
>>> This patch should be with that series, not with these dts patches.
>>>
>>
>> Why not? There should be no dependency between DTS and driver implementation.
>>
>> As DTS and driver will be merged by separate maintainers I thought it
>> would be easier for maintainers this way.
> 
> dts and driver might be merged by different people, but dt-bindings and
> drivers are merged by the same people. This is a bindings patch, not a

If we do that then I get a bunch of dtbs_check warnings

dwc3-usb@f900000: reg: [[0, 261095424, 0, 2048], [0, 261128192, 0, 1024]] is too long

> dts patch. Look at what get_maintainer says for this file:
> 	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (supporter:USB SUBSYSTEM)
> 	Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS)
> 	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS)
> 	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS)
> 	Aswath Govindraju <a-govindraju@xxxxxx> (in file)
> 	linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list:USB SUBSYSTEM)
> 	devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS)
> 	linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list)
> Greg and linux-usb are on there, but you have not CCed them.

My bad. Will be more careful next time.

> 
> Being with the driver also allows bindings maintainers to check that you
> don't break backwards compatibility. It also prevents me having to ask
> for the driver patch, then be given just a subject line that I have to
> go and look up myself!
> 

Sorry about that. It took a bit longer but I did point you directly to the
patch on lore.kernel.org.

-- 
cheers,
-roger




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux