Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: hwmon: tda38640: Add interrupt & regulator properties

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 04:59:44PM +0530, Naresh Solanki wrote:
> Add properties for interrupt & regulator.
> Also update example.

Feeling like a broken record, given I am leaving the same comments on
multiple patches. The commit message needs to explain why you're doing
something. I can read the diff and see what you did!

> 
> TEST=Run below command & make sure there is no error.
> make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check

Same comment here as elsewhere.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../hwmon/pmbus/infineon,tda38640.yaml        | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/pmbus/infineon,tda38640.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/pmbus/infineon,tda38640.yaml
> index ded1c115764b..2df625a8b514 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/pmbus/infineon,tda38640.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/pmbus/infineon,tda38640.yaml
> @@ -30,6 +30,15 @@ properties:
>        unconnected(has internal pull-down).
>      type: boolean
>  
> +  interrupts:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  regulators:
> +    $ref: /schemas/regulator/regulator.yaml#
> +    type: object
> +    description: |

The | here is not needed, there's no formatting to preserve.

From a quick check, most bindings with regulator subnodes restrict the
subnode names with patternproperties. Is there a reason you have not?

> +      list of regulators provided by this controller.
> +
>  required:
>    - compatible
>    - reg
> @@ -38,6 +47,7 @@ additionalProperties: false
>  
>  examples:
>    - |
> +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
>      i2c {
>          #address-cells = <1>;
>          #size-cells = <0>;
> @@ -45,5 +55,15 @@ examples:
>          tda38640@40 {
>              compatible = "infineon,tda38640";
>              reg = <0x40>;
> +
> +            //interrupt-parent = <&smb_pex_cpu0_event>;

Why is this commented out? Please either restore it or remove it (with
justification).

Thanks

Conor.

> +            interrupts = <10 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;

Blank line here please.

> +            regulators {
> +                pvnn_main_cpu0: vout0 {
> +                    regulator-compatible = "vout0";
> +                    regulator-name = "pvnn_main_cpu0";
> +                    regulator-enable-ramp-delay = <200>;
> +                };
> +            };
>          };
>      };
> 
> base-commit: ecb1b8288dc7ccbdcb3b9df005fa1c0e0c0388a7
> -- 
> 2.42.0
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux