On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 10:24 PM Dragan Simic <dsimic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello Shantur,
>
> On 2024-01-21 23:12, Shantur Rathore wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 2:47 PM Dragan Simic <dsimic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On 2024-01-08 13:29, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> >> > Am Montag, 8. Januar 2024, 13:11:17 CET schrieb Shantur Rathore:
> >> >> On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 9:50 AM Dragan Simic <dsimic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >> > On 2024-01-04 10:44, Shantur Rathore wrote:
> >> >> > > On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 10:08 PM Heiko Stübner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >> > >> Am Freitag, 22. Dezember 2023, 15:16:16 CET schrieb Shantur Rathore:
> >> >> > >> > USB port regulators should be controlled by PHYs
> >> >> > >> > so we remove always-on property and let PHYs manage the
> >> >> > >> > regulator.
> >> >> > >> >
> >> >> > >> > phy-supply isn't sconfugred for the TypeC port and now that we are
> >> >> > >> ^^ configured ?
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > >> > removing regulator-always-on, we need to fix the phy-supply
> >> >> > >> > so the PHYs are able to turn power to type-c port.
> >> >> > >> >
> >> >> > >> > Series-version: 2
> >> >> > >> >
> >> >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Shantur Rathore <i@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> > >> > ---
> >> >> > >> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi | 3 +--
> >> >> > >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >> >> > >> >
> >> >> > >> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi
> >> >> > >> > index bca2b50e0a..f7273f7990 100644
> >> >> > >> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi
> >> >> > >> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi
> >> >> > >> > @@ -192,7 +192,6 @@ vcc5v0_host: vcc5v0-host-regulator {
> >> >> > >> > pinctrl-names = "default";
> >> >> > >> > pinctrl-0 = <&vcc5v0_host_en>;
> >> >> > >> > regulator-name = "vcc5v0_host";
> >> >> > >> > - regulator-always-on;
> >> >> > >> > vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_usb>;
> >> >> > >> > };
> >> >> > >> >
> >> >> > >> > @@ -203,7 +202,6 @@ vcc5v0_typec: vcc5v0-typec-regulator {
> >> >> > >> > pinctrl-names = "default";
> >> >> > >> > pinctrl-0 = <&vcc5v0_typec_en>;
> >> >> > >> > regulator-name = "vcc5v0_typec";
> >> >> > >> > - regulator-always-on;
> >> >> > >> > vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_usb>;
> >> >> > >> > };
> >> >> > >> >
> >> >> > >> > @@ -859,6 +857,7 @@ &u2phy0 {
> >> >> > >> > status = "okay";
> >> >> > >> >
> >> >> > >> > u2phy0_otg: otg-port {
> >> >> > >> > + phy-supply = <&vcc5v0_typec>;
> >> >> > >> > status = "okay";
> >> >> > >> > };
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > >> Just to explain for me, what is supplying the "other" OTG port
> >> >> > >> u2phy1_otg: otg-port {}
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > >> in u2phy1 ... this one is status okay, but does not have any phy
> >> >> > >> supply?
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > > In RockPro64 there is only 1 USB-C OTG port and the other port
> >> >> > > is a USB-3.0 port.
> >> >> > > To be honest, I am not 100% sure how this all works, as I understand
> >> >> > > the USB3.0 port is wired to the second TypeC Phy.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Maybe Dragan has more info on this.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I'll have it checked and tested in detail, of course, but I have to
> >> >> > recover from this nasty flu first. Unfortunately, it has rendeded me
> >> >> > unable to even think straight.
> >> >>
> >> >> Hope you feel better soon.
> >> >> It would be awesome if we can get this in while the current merge
> >> >> window is open.
> >> >
> >> > just a small comment regarding timing. All regular development changes
> >> > need to be finished and in linux-next _before_ the merge-window opens.
> >> >
> >> > As this is not a fix it will go to 6.9 anyway - hence no need to rush.
> >>
> >> Ah, yes, I keep forgetting that the current merge window basically
> >> goes
> >> one more kernel version into the past. :) Thank you for the
> >> clarification.
> >
> > Hope you are feeling better.
> > Just to update, my patch has been dropped in u-boot in expectation of
> > it being fixed here.
>
> Yes, I saw that message on the U-Boot mailing list. Frankly, that's the
> usual way, i.e. having the DT issues fixed in the Linux kernel first,
> and
> then synced back to U-Boot.
>
> > Do you foresee it happening anytime soon?
>
> Unfortunately, I've been unable to focus well enough to be able to work
> on
> this, as a result of still recovering from the _nasty_ flu. :( Though,
> I've
> been also getting gradually better, thankfully, so while crossing all my
> fingers and knocking on wood at the same time, :) I'd dare to say that
> I'm
> expecting to be able to work on this in the next few days.
>
> I apologize for the delays. Bear with me, please! :)
You are fast in replies. Thanks for that.
I hope you feel 100% soon and no worries I was just checking.
Regards,
Shantur
