On 16/01/2024 10:30, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 08:24:20AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 16/01/2024 03:29, Frank Li wrote: >>>>> Patches were accepted after discussion, what you ponit to. So I >>>>> think everyone agree on the name 'silvaco,i3c-master-v1'. >>>>> I plan send next version to fix auto build error. Any additional >>>>> comments about this? >>>> >>>> I still do not see how did you address Rob's comment and his point is >>>> valid. You just did not reply to it. >>> >>> See https://lore.kernel.org/imx/ZXCiaKfMYYShoiXK@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810/ >> >> First of all, that's not the answer to Rob's email, but some other >> thread which is 99% ignored by Rob (unless he has filters for >> "@Rob"...). Therefore no, it does not count as valid answer. >> >> Second, explanation does not make sense. There is no argument granting >> you exception from SoC specific compatibles. > > The patch could have been applied two months ago had Frank done as > was requested (multiple times). I don't understand the resistance > towards doing so given the process has taken way way longer as a result. I think that Rob's comment was just skipped and original master binding was merged without addressing it. I don't want to repeat the same process for the "target". Indeed I could point this earlier... if I only knew that Rob pointed out that issue. Best regards, Krzysztof
