On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 04:50:25PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 12/01/2024 16:31, Frank Li wrote: > > I review previous comments. The previous RFC patches and I just want I3C > > expert review to check if there are comments about whole software > > architecture. Of course, thank you for your comments about "slave". > > > > Go back this binding doc problem. > > > > "No, it's the same device. > > > > Anyway, this was not tested. > > > > Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people > > and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older > > kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base > > your patches on recent Linux kernel. > > > > You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be > > tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be > > a waste of time, thus I will skip this patch entirely till you follow > > the process allowing the patch to be tested. > > > > Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries. > > " > > > > It is the same devices, work at difference mode (master and target). > > what's do you want to change to? > > > > Copy to new file like pci/pci-ep? all context is the same, except for > > compatible string. > > > > Apologies, I mixed up a bit patches, so this was not obvious. I meant > this comment: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231017201404.GA2570433-robh@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > There is no indication in your commit msg that these concerns were > addressed. Look like everyone already accecpted 'silvaco,i3c-master-v1'. driver part: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=8911eae9c8a947e5c1cc4fcce40473f1f5e475cd dts part: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=b8ec0f3b42a3498d5115d1fb1490082ab525747b Frank > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >