On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 08:24:20AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 16/01/2024 03:29, Frank Li wrote: > >>> Patches were accepted after discussion, what you ponit to. So I > >>> think everyone agree on the name 'silvaco,i3c-master-v1'. > >>> I plan send next version to fix auto build error. Any additional > >>> comments about this? > >> > >> I still do not see how did you address Rob's comment and his point is > >> valid. You just did not reply to it. > > > > See https://lore.kernel.org/imx/ZXCiaKfMYYShoiXK@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810/ > > First of all, that's not the answer to Rob's email, but some other > thread which is 99% ignored by Rob (unless he has filters for > "@Rob"...). Therefore no, it does not count as valid answer. > > Second, explanation does not make sense. There is no argument granting > you exception from SoC specific compatibles. The patch could have been applied two months ago had Frank done as was requested (multiple times). I don't understand the resistance towards doing so given the process has taken way way longer as a result.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
