On 01/21/2015 06:41 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> How about default to Linux id space and allow overriding that with >> a module param option if needed? > > I'm not sure I'm following. > > If the main point of contention is the base_id field, I'm also fine > with removing it entirely, as I'm not aware of any actual user for it > (Suman please confirm?). Yeah, well the current implementations that I am aware of only have a single bank, so all of them would be using a value of 0. I am yet to see a platform with multiple instances where the property really makes a difference. v7 has the property mandatory, so all the implementations would need to define this value even if it is 0. regards Suman > > Mark? Rob? Will you accept Suman's patches if the base_id field is removed? > > Thanks, > Ohad. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
