On 11.12.2023 10:46, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 at 11:33, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 10.12.2023 00:21, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> Expand Combo USB+DP QMP PHY device node with the OF ports required to
>>> support USB-C / DisplayPort switching.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi
>>> index ea7c92c0e405..38423a9f8408 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi
>>> @@ -3447,6 +3447,29 @@ usb_1_qmpphy: phy@88e8000 {
>>> #phy-cells = <1>;
>>>
>>> status = "disabled";
>>> +
>>> + ports {
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>> +
>>> + port@0 {
>>> + reg = <0>;
>>> + usb_1_qmpphy_out: endpoint {};
>> style 1
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + port@1 {
>>> + reg = <1>;
>>> +
>>> + usb_1_qmpphy_usb_ss_in: endpoint {
>>> + };
>> style 2
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + port@2 {
>>> + reg = <2>;
>>> +
>>> + usb_1_qmpphy_dp_in: endpoint {};
>> style 3
>>
>> :(
>
> Which one should I stick to?
style 2 seems to be used in 8650
Konrad
