On 02/12/2023 02:54, Sam Protsenko wrote: > On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:11 AM Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Google gs101 SoC is ARMv8 mobile SoC found in the Pixel 6, >> (oriole) Pixel 6a (bluejay) and Pixel 6 pro (raven) mobile >> phones. It features: >> * 4xA55 little cluster >> * 2xA76 Mid cluster >> * 2xX1 Big cluster >> >> This commit adds the basic device tree for gs101 (SoC). >> Further platform support will be added over time. >> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- ... >> + >> + watchdog_cl0: watchdog@10060000 { >> + compatible = "google,gs101-wdt"; >> + reg = <0x10060000 0x100>; >> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 765 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>; >> + clocks = >> + <&cmu_misc CLK_GOUT_MISC_WDT_CLUSTER0_IPCLKPORT_PCLK>, >> + <&ext_24_5m>; >> + clock-names = "watchdog", "watchdog_src"; >> + samsung,syscon-phandle = <&pmu_system_controller>; >> + samsung,cluster-index = <0>; >> + status = "disabled"; >> + }; > > Krzysztof, can you please advice which scheme is preferred right now: > sorting by name or by address? I saw your patch for dts style doc, but > just want to know the current state of affairs. Use coding style, so sorting by unit address in DTSI and by label/phandle of overrides in DTS. Coding style was not yet applied, but I don't see any objections to it so it is just a matter of days. Best regards, Krzysztof