Re: [PATCH 2/5] dt-bindings: soc: sophgo: Add Sophgo syscon module

[Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 09:19:02PM +0800, Chen Wang wrote:
> From: Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Add documentation to describe Sophgo System Controller Registers for
> SG2042.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../soc/sophgo/sophgo,sg2042-syscon.yaml      | 38 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/sophgo/sophgo,sg2042-syscon.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/sophgo/sophgo,sg2042-syscon.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/sophgo/sophgo,sg2042-syscon.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..829abede4fd5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/sophgo/sophgo,sg2042-syscon.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/soc/sophgo/sophgo,sg2042-syscon.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Sophgo SG2042 SoC system controller
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +description:
> +  The Sophgo SG2042 SoC system controller provides register information such
> +  as offset, mask and shift to configure related modules.
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    oneOf:
> +      - items:
> +          - enum:
> +              - sophgo,sg2042-syscon
> +          - const: syscon

THere's only one option here, so the oneOf should be removed. Similarly,
since there's only one SoC, and it sounds like the next large sophgo
system is going to be using an entirely different core provider, I think
should just simplify this to a pair of "const:" entries.

> +
> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    syscon@30010000 {
> +        compatible = "sophgo,sg2042-syscon", "syscon";
> +        reg = <0x30010000 0x1000>;
> +    };

Per my comments elsewhere, I think the clock controller should be a
child of this node, rather than an unrelated node, linked by a phandle.

Cheers,
Conor.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature