Re: [Patch v5 2/2] gpio: Document GPIO hogging mechanism

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 01/12/15 11:20, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Benoit Parrot<bparrot@xxxxxx>  wrote:

Add GPIO hogging documentation to gpio.txt

Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot<bparrot@xxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot<acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx>

This is starting to look good ...

+               line_b {
+                       gpio-hog;
+                       gpios =<6 0>;
+                       state = "output-low";

I don't like the state string.

Instead have boolean properties for all states.

line_b {
     gpio-hog;
     gpios =<6 0>;
     output-low;
     line-name = "foo-bar-gpio";
}

Then use of_property_read_bool() in the code to check which
state is to be selected intially. You can check that no mutually
exclusive state are selected, I don't like that an arbitrary string
select the state like that, if we do it that way an enumerator would
be better, I prefer bools.

To avoid the mutual exclusive state checking, would it not be more straightforward to use numeric enum values defined in boot/dts/include.

Regards,
Arend

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux