On 09/11/2023 07:28, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 06:47:46PM +0900, Jaewon Kim wrote: >> Add samsung,exynosautov920-pwm compatible string to binding document. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml >> index 2162f661ed5a..b6beca2ae81e 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml >> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ properties: >> - items: >> - enum: >> - samsung,exynosautov9-pwm >> + - samsung,exynosautov920-pwm >> - const: samsung,exynos4210-pwm > > Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > What is the merge plan here? Should this go via the pwm tree, or can it > better go via some exynos tree together with the dts files? I propose I will take it. I will have conflicting change and keeping bindings with DTS together allows smooth dtbs_check. Best regards, Krzysztof
