On 23. 11. 9. 17:23, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 09/11/2023 07:28, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 06:47:46PM +0900, Jaewon Kim wrote: >>> Add samsung,exynosautov920-pwm compatible string to binding document. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml >>> index 2162f661ed5a..b6beca2ae81e 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml >>> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ properties: >>> - items: >>> - enum: >>> - samsung,exynosautov9-pwm >>> + - samsung,exynosautov920-pwm >>> - const: samsung,exynos4210-pwm >> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> What is the merge plan here? Should this go via the pwm tree, or can it >> better go via some exynos tree together with the dts files? > I propose I will take it. I will have conflicting change and keeping > bindings with DTS together allows smooth dtbs_check. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > > I also agree it would be better to enter the exynos tree. Thanks Krzysztof. Thanks, Jaewon Kim
