On 20/10/2023 10:13, Tao Zhang wrote: >>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c >>> index b25284e..97654aa 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c >>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c >>> @@ -892,7 +892,7 @@ static int tpdm_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id) >>> >>> if (drvdata && tpdm_has_dsb_dataset(drvdata)) >>> of_property_read_u32(drvdata->dev->of_node, >>> - "qcom,dsb_msr_num", &drvdata->dsb_msr_num); >>> + "qcom,dsb-msrs-num", &drvdata->dsb_msr_num); >> So you never tested your DTS... We can keep asking about this but still >> testing does not happen :/ > > Since this new property has not been applied on the exist upstream DTS, > I tested this driver with the > > local DTS. Unfortunately, the property name in the local DTS is not > updated, this is why it is not found But your local DTS would not pass dtbs_check tests, so that's why I am saying - you never tested it on mainline kernel. Best regards, Krzysztof
