> So developers/hackers can use them for custom needs by just dropping
> "disabled" bit. That's a pretty simple step compared to figuring out
> that a fixed link is needed.
>
> I can imagine advanced users using extra ports and interfaces to get
> higher speeds. If you use a single switch port and single interface
> you're limited to 1 Gbps. By using two you can exceed that limitation.
>
> This is clearly some corner case but I don't think it really violates
> what DT is for. We just describe hardware more clearly. There is a fixed
> link after all. That port just happens to be disabled.
Please reformulate this into the commit message. Then it becomes a
good answer to the question `Why?` which is what the commit message is
all about.
Andrew
