On 17/10/2023 18:55, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>
>
> On 10/16/23 19:55, Robert Marko wrote:
>> IPQ6018 comes in multiple SKU-s and some of them dont support all of the
>> OPP-s that are current set, so lets utilize CPUFreq NVMEM to allow only
>> supported OPP-s based on the SoC dynamically.
>>
>> As an example, IPQ6018 is generaly rated at 1.8GHz but some silicon only
>> goes up to 1.5GHz and is marked as such via an eFuse.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi | 14 +++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
>> index 9aec89d5e095b..49f0e6aa4b5bb 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
>> @@ -96,42 +96,49 @@ scm {
>> };
>>
> [...]
>
>> + cpu_speed_bin: cpu_speed_bin@135 {
> underscore -> minus sign
>
> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
I think Bjorn does not read comments, so he just picks up such patches
because they got review. Better to ask for fixing it, instead of giving
conditional review tag, IMHO.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
