On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 19:13, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 17/10/2023 18:55, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 10/16/23 19:55, Robert Marko wrote:
> >> IPQ6018 comes in multiple SKU-s and some of them dont support all of the
> >> OPP-s that are current set, so lets utilize CPUFreq NVMEM to allow only
> >> supported OPP-s based on the SoC dynamically.
> >>
> >> As an example, IPQ6018 is generaly rated at 1.8GHz but some silicon only
> >> goes up to 1.5GHz and is marked as such via an eFuse.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi | 14 +++++++++++++-
> >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
> >> index 9aec89d5e095b..49f0e6aa4b5bb 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
> >> @@ -96,42 +96,49 @@ scm {
> >> };
> >>
> > [...]
> >
> >> + cpu_speed_bin: cpu_speed_bin@135 {
> > underscore -> minus sign
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I think Bjorn does not read comments, so he just picks up such patches
> because they got review. Better to ask for fixing it, instead of giving
> conditional review tag, IMHO.
I will fix it up in v2, I am just waiting to see if there are comments
on the driver patch.
Regards,
Robert
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
