On 14/09/2023 08:53, Peng Fan wrote: >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm64: dts: imx93: update gpio node >> >> On 14/09/2023 08:04, Peng Fan wrote: >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm64: dts: imx93: update gpio node >>>> >>>> On 14/09/2023 04:21, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote: >>>>> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> Per binding doc, i.MX93 GPIO supports two interrupts, and not >>>>> compatible with i.MX7ULP. So update the node >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> >>>>> --- >>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93.dtsi | 20 ++++++++++++-------- >>>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93.dtsi >>>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93.dtsi >>>>> index 6f85a05ee7e1..011c34a57c53 100644 >>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93.dtsi >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93.dtsi >>>>> @@ -825,11 +825,12 @@ usdhc3: mmc@428b0000 { >>>>> }; >>>>> >>>>> gpio2: gpio@43810080 { >>>>> - compatible = "fsl,imx93-gpio", "fsl,imx7ulp-gpio"; >>>>> + compatible = "fsl,imx93-gpio", "fsl,imx8ulp-gpio"; >>>> >>>> As your driver change points, it is breaking users, so no :( >>> >>> ok. Although i.MX93 GPIO is not compatible with i.MX7ULP from HW >>> perspective, the compatible string should keep as it is now and >>> binding >> >> If it is not compatible, then how could it work before? > > i.MX7ULP reg: > 0h Port Data Output Register (PDOR) > 4h Port Set Output Register (PSOR) > 8h Port Clear Output Register (PCOR) > Ch Port Toggle Output Register (PTOR) > 10h Port Data Input Register (PDIR) > 14h Port Data Direction Register (PDDR) > > i.MX8ULP/93 has different registers address, but > i.MX93 registers has 0x40 off as below: > 40h Port Data Output (PDOR) > > Even linux i.MX7ULP gpio driver could work with i.MX8ULP/93 > GPIO HW with dts node using an 0x40 offset + base addr > for i.MX93 gpio. I think from hw design, they are > not compatible. Besides the upper differences, > there are other differences. Sorry, I don't understand it. I asked how could they work before in Linux, if they are not compatible, and you pasted regs. So again - if they are not compatible, how could it work? Or maybe it never worked? But then commit msg would say it. Best regards, Krzysztof