> -----Original Message----- > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 2:31 PM > To: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@xxxxxxx>; Ulf Hansson > <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Krzysztof Kozlowski > <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Conor Dooley <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; > Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@xxxxxxxxx>; Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>; > imx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@xxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: power: Add regulator-pd yaml > > The fixed-regulator is a virtual regulator driver that uses the GPIO pin. > > We do not talk about drivers but bindings and DTS. Why do you bring again > drivers, all the time? > > > You claimed this > > as a hardware chip. > > ??? Sorry, this is getting boring. The DTS-snippet is a hardware chip. > If it is not, then drop it from your DTS. I insist. Srsly, third time I insist. > > > > > > The regulator-pd driver also uses the same GPIO pin. > > Again, what is with the drivers? Can you stop bringing it to the discussion? > I have to admit you have a real talent for debate. Thanks, Shenwei > > You now claimed this as a software layer. > > ??? > > > > > What's your standard? > > I don't think there is anything more to say. You clearly do not understand what is > DTS, schematics and how the actual hardware looks like. > > I am not going to respond more to this patchset (which is a clear NAK just in > case). > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
