On 24/08/2023 15:00, Emmanuel Gil Peyrot wrote:
>>> @@ -2027,6 +2028,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, bq24190_i2c_ids);
>>> static const struct of_device_id bq24190_of_match[] = {
>>> { .compatible = "ti,bq24190", },
>>> { .compatible = "ti,bq24192", },
>>> + { .compatible = "ti,bq24193", },
>>> { .compatible = "ti,bq24192i", },
>>> { .compatible = "ti,bq24196", },
>>
>> We should really stop doing this. All of them are compatible, aren't they?
>
> From what I gather from the different datasheets, the main difference
> between them is the maximum current they are able to provide, 1.5 A for
> the bq24190 and bq24192i, 3 A for bq24192 and 4.5 A for bq24193. The
> default current limit is also detected differently it seems. But yeah,
> those are otherwise similar enough to not require anything different in
> the driver.
>
> What would be a good way forward for that? Adding a new ti,bq2419x
> compatible and switching all devices to this one, as long as they don’t
> require anything specific?
Not a wildcard but any of existing ones, e.g. "ti,bq24196", "ti,bq24190".
Best regards,
Krzysztof
