On 09/08/2023 01:31, Saravana Kannan wrote: >> >>> + reg = <0x1040000 0x10>; >>> + compatible = "virtual,cpufreq"; >> >> compatible is always the first property. >> >> Also, you did not test it... > > Why do you say this? This patch series was obviously tested very well > with all the data we collected. Why do I say? Because of warning and huge fat Python exception? Test it... you will see. Best regards, Krzysztof