> -----Original Message----- > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, 2 August, 2023 3:02 PM > To: Rabara, Niravkumar L <niravkumar.l.rabara@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Ng, Adrian Ho Yin <adrian.ho.yin.ng@xxxxxxxxx>; andrew@xxxxxxx; > conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dinguyen@xxxxxxxxxx; > krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Turquette, Mike <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; > netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > richardcochran@xxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx; > wen.ping.teh@xxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] dt-bindings: clock: add Intel Agilex5 clock > manager > > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 10:58:42AM +0800, niravkumar.l.rabara@xxxxxxxxx > wrote: > > From: Niravkumar L Rabara <niravkumar.l.rabara@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Add clock ID definitions for Intel Agilex5 SoCFPGA. > > The registers in Agilex5 handling the clock is named as clock manager. > > > > Signed-off-by: Teh Wen Ping <wen.ping.teh@xxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Niravkumar L Rabara <niravkumar.l.rabara@xxxxxxxxx> > > Damn, I was too late - you already sent a v3 :/ > > However, there only seems to be a v3 of this one patch and it was sent in > reply to the v2 series? The normal thing to do is resend the entire series, not > just one patch, as a new thread. Not using a new thread may make it harder > to apply & will also bury the email in people's mailboxes that use things like > mutt. A single patch as a reply is also confusing, as the rest of the v3 looks like > it is missing! > > Thanks, > Conor. Sorry I made a mistake. Should I send out entire series with PATCH v3 subject? Or should I wait for review comment on remaining patches and then send entire series with rework and subject prefix PATCH v3? Thanks, Nirav
