On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 02:18:43PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 26/07/2023 13:55, Mark Brown wrote: > > Oh, you mean if the regulator is in use in the system rather than if > > it's enabled! > Enabled as "always-on" or "boot-on" could be encoded in the schema with > multiple if::then:. But it is not enough, because regulators can be > enabled on demand by drivers. So that's what I meant by "used". Right, you said "enabled" in the changelog bit though. > > I suspect that there's a requirement that either at least > > one of the supplies be provided so that the chip I/O works, or there's > > some other currently undocumented supply that is required for that > > reason. > I can add requirement of at least one supply. I don't think it changes > much, but sure. I wouldn't, I suspect it's the latter case and there's actually another undocumented change.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
