> -----Original Message----- > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, July 21, 2023 5:36 PM > To: Li, Meng <Meng.Li@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; dinguyen@xxxxxxxxxx; > robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; > devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH] arm64: dts: stratix10: add new compatible for Intel > SoCFPGA Stratix10 platform > > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and > know the content is safe. > > On 21/07/2023 11:29, Li, Meng wrote: > >>>>>> NAK, don't fake reviews. This very impolite and destroys entire trust. > >>>>>> The model of upstream collaboration depends on the trust, which > >>>>>> is now gone for Windriver. > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> No! I don't fake a tag. > >>>> > >>>> Really? Then I ask second time - from where did you get it? Provide a link. > >>>> > >>> > >>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230718030851.2014306-1-Meng.Li@windri > >>> ve > >>> r.com/T/ > >> > >> So where is it? You pointed to your email. Where is the tag? > >> > > > > Sorry! Maybe I have wrong understanding about TAG. > > From my perspective, If reviewers ask question or give some advices to the > patch, I need to add the tag to v2. > > This is some crazy idea. So you want to sprinkle some tags, just because > someone disagrees with your patch and explicitly gives you a NAK, which means > NOT-Ack, Not-acknowledge, not accepted, not in good shape. > > I actually wonder why adding an acknowledging tag for the patch, if I disagreed > and gave you NAK. Following your logic, this should be a NAK tag. This I could > understand. But giving acknowledge when I clearly said patch is wrong? > Very sorry for wasting your time because of lack of understanding about upstream rules. And thanks for many explanations patiently, this will help me make progress. > Read all process documents before submitting new patches: > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/ > Ok! I will check these docs. Thanks, Limeng > > If it is not allowed, I apologize for that. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
