On 21/07/2023 11:29, Li, Meng wrote: >>>>>> NAK, don't fake reviews. This very impolite and destroys entire trust. >>>>>> The model of upstream collaboration depends on the trust, which is >>>>>> now gone for Windriver. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> No! I don't fake a tag. >>>> >>>> Really? Then I ask second time - from where did you get it? Provide a link. >>>> >>> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230718030851.2014306-1-Meng.Li@windrive >>> r.com/T/ >> >> So where is it? You pointed to your email. Where is the tag? >> > > Sorry! Maybe I have wrong understanding about TAG. > From my perspective, If reviewers ask question or give some advices to the patch, I need to add the tag to v2. This is some crazy idea. So you want to sprinkle some tags, just because someone disagrees with your patch and explicitly gives you a NAK, which means NOT-Ack, Not-acknowledge, not accepted, not in good shape. I actually wonder why adding an acknowledging tag for the patch, if I disagreed and gave you NAK. Following your logic, this should be a NAK tag. This I could understand. But giving acknowledge when I clearly said patch is wrong? Read all process documents before submitting new patches: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/ > If it is not allowed, I apologize for that. Best regards, Krzysztof
