On 7/10/2023 5:40 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 10.07.2023 13:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 10/07/2023 12:54, Kathiravan T wrote:
IPQ5019 SoC is not available in production. Lets drop it.
Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h
index bcbe9ee2cdaf..179dd56b2d95 100644
--- a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h
@@ -250,7 +250,6 @@
#define QCOM_ID_QRU1000 539
#define QCOM_ID_QDU1000 545
#define QCOM_ID_QDU1010 587
-#define QCOM_ID_IPQ5019 569
What about users of this binding? What's the impact on them? When did
the SoC become obsolete and unsupported by Qualcomm? Remember that
ceasing a production does not mean that magically all users of a product
disappear...
This + from my experience, SOCID entries are set in stone and freed
indices are never reclaimed
This SKU is planned but never productized. That's why I removed it.
May be I should be more precise in the commit title. Should I leave it
as it is / remove it?
Thanks, Kathiravan T.
Konrad
Best regards,
Krzysztof
