Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom,ids: drop the IPQ5019 SoC ID

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 7/10/2023 5:40 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 10.07.2023 13:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 10/07/2023 12:54, Kathiravan T wrote:
IPQ5019 SoC is not available in production. Lets drop it.

Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h | 1 -
  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h
index bcbe9ee2cdaf..179dd56b2d95 100644
--- a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h
@@ -250,7 +250,6 @@
  #define QCOM_ID_QRU1000			539
  #define QCOM_ID_QDU1000			545
  #define QCOM_ID_QDU1010			587
-#define QCOM_ID_IPQ5019			569
What about users of this binding? What's the impact on them? When did
the SoC become obsolete and unsupported by Qualcomm? Remember that
ceasing a production does not mean that magically all users of a product
disappear...
This + from my experience, SOCID entries are set in stone and freed
indices are never reclaimed


This SKU is planned but never productized. That's why I removed it.

May be I should be more precise in the commit title. Should I leave it as it is / remove it?


Thanks, Kathiravan T.


Konrad

Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux