On 10.07.2023 13:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 10/07/2023 12:54, Kathiravan T wrote: >> IPQ5019 SoC is not available in production. Lets drop it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h | 1 - >> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h >> index bcbe9ee2cdaf..179dd56b2d95 100644 >> --- a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h >> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h >> @@ -250,7 +250,6 @@ >> #define QCOM_ID_QRU1000 539 >> #define QCOM_ID_QDU1000 545 >> #define QCOM_ID_QDU1010 587 >> -#define QCOM_ID_IPQ5019 569 > > What about users of this binding? What's the impact on them? When did > the SoC become obsolete and unsupported by Qualcomm? Remember that > ceasing a production does not mean that magically all users of a product > disappear... This + from my experience, SOCID entries are set in stone and freed indices are never reclaimed Konrad > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
