On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 02:11:09PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 19/06/2023 13:44, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 01:14:34PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > > On 16/06/2023 17:37, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 04:59:21PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
...
> > > > > +struct ub953_clkout_data {
> > > > > + u32 hs_div;
> > > > > + u32 m;
> > > > > + u32 n;
> > > >
> > > > Please, use struxt u32_fract instead of m/n.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure how that helps. The documentation talks about m and n. Using
> > > different terms will make it more difficult to compare the code and the
> > > docs.
> >
> > You can always add a comment.
> >
> > (For example in drivers/clk/clk-fractional-divider.c our documentation also
> > says about m/n, but most of the people understands that this is about
> > fractional divider and actually with properly spelled parameters it will
> > help others who are not experts in the CLK hardware.)
>
> Yes, I would agree with you if this was a generic piece of code, but I don't
> see the reasoning as valid as this is specific to a piece of hardware. Here,
> I think, matching the code to the HW documentation is more important than
> possibly making the code more understandable to people who are not familiar
> with the HW.
>
> Especially as for non-English people seeing "numerator" and "denominator"
> might require a check to figure out which one is which, whereas m and n are
> (I would guess) a bit more universal (or maybe it's just me).
I think for unprepared user the English plain words are simpler,
or maybe it's just me.
At least we have a strong disagreement here, seems :-)
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
