Hello, On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 07:56:22PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > based on an earlier submission by Aurelien Jarno, I rebased and slightly > simplified the patches. > > There was some related irc conversion in #armlinux. Quoting the relevant > parts: > > 1685078851< ukleinek> arnd, [florian]: Who would pick up https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220410225940.135744-1-aurelien@xxxxxxxxxxx ? > 1685078920< ukleinek> arnd, [florian]: If there is an agreement in general that this is a good idea, I can coordinate with Aurelien that for arm64 there is a v2 with the simpler approach I pointed out. > 1685083481< arnd> ukleinek: I have no objections to this, if [florian] wants to pick it up and send me for 6.5. > 1685083809< arnd> robher: any comments on this one? > 1685466520 < [florian]> ukleinek: I was hoping we would get an Ack for robher before picking it up in the brcm soc tree, don't want to ruffle any feathers unnecessarily > > So it seems to start a beneficial chain reaction, only Rob's Ack is > needed. Not sure this might help, but as Rob seems to be away for mail, I'll try: arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/Makefile and arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile also make use of -@. So this patch at least isn't a completely new thing and maybe Florian might dare to take this patch even without Rob's explicit consent?! Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
