On 26.05.2023 15:22, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Fri, 26 May 2023 at 15:54, Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> IPQ6018 has efuse region to determine the various HW quirks. Lets
>> add the initial support and the individual fuses will be added as they
>> are required.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Changes in V2:
>> - Reorder the node based on node address
>>
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
>> index f531797f2619..0f6d6c6daed2 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
>> @@ -302,6 +302,13 @@
>> status = "disabled";
>> };
>>
>> + qfprom: efuse@a4000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,ipq6018-qfprom", "qcom,qfprom";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x000a4000 0x0 0x2000>;
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <1>;
>> + };
>> +
>> prng: qrng@e1000 {
>> compatible = "qcom,prng-ee";
>> reg = <0x0 0x000e3000 0x0 0x1000>;
>
> It looks like the prng node name is incorrect. It should be qrng@e3000
> instead of qrng@e1000. Could you please send a followup to fix it?
In case that wasn't clear, since I think this series will go in as-is,
that fix would be sent separately, on top of this.
Konrad
>
> For this patch:
>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
>
>
