On Fri, 26 May 2023 at 15:54, Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> IPQ6018 has efuse region to determine the various HW quirks. Lets
> add the initial support and the individual fuses will be added as they
> are required.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in V2:
> - Reorder the node based on node address
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
> index f531797f2619..0f6d6c6daed2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
> @@ -302,6 +302,13 @@
> status = "disabled";
> };
>
> + qfprom: efuse@a4000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,ipq6018-qfprom", "qcom,qfprom";
> + reg = <0x0 0x000a4000 0x0 0x2000>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> + };
> +
> prng: qrng@e1000 {
> compatible = "qcom,prng-ee";
> reg = <0x0 0x000e3000 0x0 0x1000>;
It looks like the prng node name is incorrect. It should be qrng@e3000
instead of qrng@e1000. Could you please send a followup to fix it?
For this patch:
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
