On 08/05/2023 16:13, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
According to the msm-3.18 vendor kernel from Qualcomm, mdm9607 needs
"correction factors" to adjust for additional offsets observed after the
factory calibration values in the fuses [1, 2].
The fixed offsets should be applied unless there is a special
calibration mode value that indicates that no offsets are needed [3].
Note that the new calibration mode values are called differently in this
patch compared to the vendor kernel:
- TSENS_TWO_POINT_CALIB_N_WA -> ONE_PT_CALIB2_NO_OFFSET
- TSENS_TWO_POINT_CALIB_N_OFFSET_WA -> TWO_PT_CALIB_NO_OFFSET
This is because close inspection of the calibration function [3] reveals
that TSENS_TWO_POINT_CALIB_N_WA is actually a "one point" calibration
because the if statements skip all "point2" related code for it.
Indeed.
[1]: https://git.codelinaro.org/clo/la/kernel/msm-3.18/-/commit/d9d2db1b82bf3f72f5de0803d55e6849eb5b671e
[2]: https://git.codelinaro.org/clo/la/kernel/msm-3.18/-/commit/d75aef53a760e8ff7bac54049d00c8b2ee1b193e
[3]: https://git.codelinaro.org/clo/la/kernel/msm-3.18/-/blob/LE.UM.4.3.2.r1-04200-9x07/drivers/thermal/msm-tsens.c#L2987-3136
Fixes: a2149ab815fc ("thermal/drivers/qcom/tsens-v0_1: Add support for MDM9607")
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c | 11 +++++++++++
drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h | 4 ++++
3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c
index 1b454de3928d..e69889dd524a 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c
@@ -229,6 +229,17 @@ static int __init init_9607(struct tsens_priv *priv)
for (i = 0; i < priv->num_sensors; ++i)
priv->sensor[i].slope = 3000;
+ priv->sensor[0].p1_calib_offset = 1;
+ priv->sensor[0].p2_calib_offset = 1;
+ priv->sensor[1].p1_calib_offset = -4;
+ priv->sensor[1].p2_calib_offset = -2;
+ priv->sensor[2].p1_calib_offset = 4;
+ priv->sensor[2].p2_calib_offset = 8;
+ priv->sensor[3].p1_calib_offset = -3;
+ priv->sensor[3].p2_calib_offset = -5;
+ priv->sensor[4].p1_calib_offset = -4;
+ priv->sensor[4].p2_calib_offset = -4;
+
return init_common(priv);
}
I should check if using these offsets would allow us to drop the custom
code for 8974.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
