On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 02:58:02PM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:
> On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 2:53 PM Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 02:42:10PM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 5:22 AM Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 02:23:01AM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > > > > The first SoC in the T-HEAD series is light(a.k.a th1520), containing
> > > > > quad T-HEAD C910 cores.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs | 6 ++++++
> > > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs b/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs
> > > > > index 1cf69f958f10..ce10a38dff37 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs
> > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs
> > > > > @@ -41,6 +41,12 @@ config ARCH_SUNXI
> > > > > This enables support for Allwinner sun20i platform hardware,
> > > > > including boards based on the D1 and D1s SoCs.
> > > > >
> > > > > +config ARCH_THEAD
> > > >
> > > > Could you please add a defconfig patch, adding this option, so that we
> > > > build support for this platform by default?
> >
> > > Yes, but it's another patch, see: 'commit eb20e7cb91ba ("riscv:
> > > defconfig: Enable the Allwinner D1 platform and drivers")'
> >
> > But that's ARCH_SUNXI for the Allwinner D1. If the TH1520 is a
> > first-party SoC, and not an Allwinner product, it needs a new Kconfig
> > entry etc.
> > If it is an Allwinner, then the dts etc should be in the Allwinner
> > directory too.
> Do you mean?
> config ARCH_THEAD
> def_bool SOC_THEAD
>
> config SOC_THEAD
> bool "T-HEAD SoCs"
>
> In defconfig:
> +CONFIG_SOC_THEAD=y
No, this patch is okay as-is. CONFIG_ARCH_THEAD=y would go into
defconfig in another patch.
Cheers,
Conor.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
