On 06/05/2023 04:37, Bough Chen wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: 2023年5月6日 1:48 >> To: Bough Chen <haibo.chen@xxxxxxx>; adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx; >> ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; >> krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx; >> s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Cc: dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@xxxxxxx>; kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >> festevam@xxxxxxxxx; cniedermaier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dt-bindings: mmc: fsl-imx-esdhc: remove property >> "fsl,wp-controller" >> >> On 05/05/2023 12:12, haibo.chen@xxxxxxx wrote: >>> From: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@xxxxxxx> >>> >>> Driver do not use this property, so remove it here. >> >> That's not true, it uses. I got only patch #3 and nothing else. > > This v2 patch only fix a dt-check error, for patch1,2,4, still not get comments, so I do not send out to avoid noise. So while sending a patchset of 4 patches you skipped 1+2+4? This does not make sense. Send entire patchset. The patch by itself, without context, is incorrect and not justified. Best regards, Krzysztof
