On 5/3/23 09:40, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 03/05/2023 09:27, Michal Simek wrote:
On 5/2/23 22:13, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
CAUTION: This message has originated from an External Source. Please use proper judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to this email.
On 02/05/2023 15:53, Michal Simek wrote:
From: Varalaxmi Bingi <varalaxmi.bingi@xxxxxxx>
Setting default i2c clock frequency for Zynq to maximum rate of 400kHz.
Current default value is 100kHz.
Signed-off-by: Varalaxmi Bingi <varalaxmi.bingi@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi
index cd9931f6bcbd..a7db3f3009f2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi
@@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ i2c0: i2c@e0004000 {
clocks = <&clkc 38>;
interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
interrupts = <0 25 4>;
+ clock-frequency = <400000>;
I think this should be rather property of the board, because it depends
on I2C devices, right?
We have 15+ boards with i2c connected and from this count I am aware about only
one configuration which is not working on 400k.
It is a question if make sense to update all boards (except for 1 and not all in
kernel yet) to 400k or just say 400k is default and if there is any issue use
lower frequency.
Obviously this patch is setting up 400k as default and let "problematic" boards
to setup lower freq.
The same approach was used for modepin description.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp.dtsi?h=v6.3&id=53ba1b2bdaf7f481fdd878e9c18cd0e54081fac9
The next point is that 100k is default in Linux but doesn't mean it is default
in other projects.
But if you think that it must be board property I think we should setup 100k as
default in this file too to make it clear.
No, if it is conscious choice, it's fine.
Is it Ack then or you want me to extend commit message?
Thanks,
Michal
