On 02/05/2023 12:09, Gaddam, Sarath Babu Naidu wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Gaddam, Sarath Babu Naidu
>> <sarath.babu.naidu.gaddam@xxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2023 9:31 PM
>> To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>;
>> davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx;
>> pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
>> krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx; radhey.shyam.pandey@xxxxxxxxxx;
>> netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-
>> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Sarangi,
>> Anirudha <anirudha.sarangi@xxxxxxx>; Katakam, Harini
>> <harini.katakam@xxxxxxx>; git (AMD-Xilinx) <git@xxxxxxx>
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next V7] dt-bindings: net: xlnx,axi-ethernet:
>> convert bindings document to yaml
>>
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Gaddam, Sarath Babu Naidu
>>> <sarath.babu.naidu.gaddam@xxxxxxx>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2023 6:22 PM
>>> To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>;
>>> davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx;
>>> pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
>>> krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> Cc: michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx; radhey.shyam.pandey@xxxxxxxxxx;
>>> netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-
>>> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Sarangi,
>>> Anirudha <anirudha.sarangi@xxxxxxx>; Katakam, Harini
>>> <harini.katakam@xxxxxxx>; git (AMD-Xilinx) <git@xxxxxxx>
>>> Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next V7] dt-bindings: net: xlnx,axi-ethernet:
>>> convert bindings document to yaml
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 9:22 PM
>>>> To: Gaddam, Sarath Babu Naidu
>>>> <sarath.babu.naidu.gaddam@xxxxxxx>; davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>>>> edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx; pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx;
>>>> robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Cc: michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx; radhey.shyam.pandey@xxxxxxxxxx;
>>>> netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-
>>>> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Sarangi,
>>>> Anirudha <anirudha.sarangi@xxxxxxx>; Katakam, Harini
>>>> <harini.katakam@xxxxxxx>; git (AMD-Xilinx) <git@xxxxxxx>
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V7] dt-bindings: net: xlnx,axi-ethernet:
>>>> convert bindings document to yaml
>>>>
>>>> On 08/03/2023 07:12, Sarath Babu Naidu Gaddam wrote:
>>>>> From: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> Convert the bindings document for Xilinx AXI Ethernet Subsystem
>>> from
>>>>> txt to yaml. No changes to existing binding description.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> (...)
>>>>
>>>>> +properties:
>>>>> + compatible:
>>>>> + enum:
>>>>> + - xlnx,axi-ethernet-1.00.a
>>>>> + - xlnx,axi-ethernet-1.01.a
>>>>> + - xlnx,axi-ethernet-2.01.a
>>>>> +
>>>>> + reg:
>>>>> + description:
>>>>> + Address and length of the IO space, as well as the address
>>>>> + and length of the AXI DMA controller IO space, unless
>>>>> + axistream-connected is specified, in which case the reg
>>>>> + attribute of the node referenced by it is used.
>>>>
>>>> Did you test it with axistream-connected? The schema and description
>>>> feel contradictory and tests would point the issue.
>>>
>>> Thanks for review comments. We tested with axistream-connected and
>> did
>>> not observe any errors. Do you anticipate any issues/errors ?
>>
>> Just to add more details, we have tested it using below dt node
>>
>> axienet@0 {
>> axistream-connected = <&dma>;
>> reg = <0x00 0x80000000 0x00 0x40000>;
>> compatible = "xlnx,axi-ethernet-2.01.a";
>> clock-names = "s_axi_lite_clk\0axis_clk\0ref_clk";
>> clocks = <0x03 0x47 0x03 0x47 0x18>;
>> phy-mode = "sgmii";
>> xlnx,rxcsum = <0x02>;
>> xlnx,rxmem = <0x1000>;
>> xlnx,txcsum = <0x02>;
>> pcs-handle = <0x19>;
>> phy-handle = <0x78>;
>> dmas = <0x17 0x00 0x17 0x01>;
>> dma-names = "tx_chan0\0rx_chan0";
>> mac-address = [ff ff ff ff ff ff];
>> managed = "in-band-status";
>> phandle = <0x79>;
>> mdio {
>> #address-cells = <0x01>;
>> #size-cells = <0x00>;
>>
>> phy@0 {
>> compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
>> reg = <0x00>;
>> phandle = <0x78>;
>> };
>>
>> ethernet-phy@2 {
>> device_type = "ethernet-phy";
>> reg = <0x02>;
>> phandle = <0x19>;
>> };
>> };
>> };
>> This DT node works with our board. "&dma" is the dma DT node and to
>> test the second case where dma address and length included in the
>> axienet reg's property as below "reg = <0x00 0x80000000 0x00 0x40000
>> 0x0 0x80040000 0x0 0x1000>;"
>>
>> I did not observe any issue with above two cases. Used below command
>> to validate the yaml using above DT node.
>> make dtbs_check
>> DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/xlnx,axi-
>> ethernet.yaml
>>
>
> Hi Krzysztof, Can you please comment If above explanation is acceptable ?
> I will address remaining review comments and send the next version.
The DTS you pointed obviously cannot work with the binding - it has
obvious mistakes. Starting with phy-mode. So whatever you did, was not
correct testing. Since nothing from your code is upstream, I cannot
verify it.
Upstream your DTS first.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
