Hi Luca, > > Ah, you mean we agreed on that at the Plumbers BoF? I think we can > > conclude this is obsolete meanwhile. GMSL encodes the target addresses > > in DT. Rob is also fine with the binding here to encode the pool in DT. > > Let's follow that road, I'd say. > > Sure, I'm not questioning that. Apologies if it did look like. I was > just trying to explain (to myself as well) why this hadn't been done > previously. All fine. I didn't understand it this way and mainly wanted to summarize what happened since the BoF. To myself as well ;) And also for Tomi so he knows what happened.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
