Re: [PATCH 09/10] arm64: tegra: Rework SOCTHERM on Tegra132 and Tegra210

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14/04/2023 14:57, Thierry Reding wrote:
From: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>

The "heavy throttle" cooling device that SOCTHERM uses isn't a cooling
device in the traditional sense. It's an automatic mechanism that cannot
be actively controlled. Do not expose it as a cooling device and instead
of tying it to a specific trip point, hard-code the temperature at which
the automatic throttling will begin.

While at it, clean up the trip point names to reflect the names used by
the thermal device tree bindings.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra132.dtsi | 63 +++++-------------
  arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210.dtsi | 83 +++++++-----------------
  2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra132.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra132.dtsi
index 8b78be8f4f9d..11ebf7517df1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra132.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra132.dtsi
@@ -876,11 +876,10 @@ soctherm: thermal-sensor@700e2000 {
  		#thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
throttle-cfgs {
-			throttle_heavy: heavy {
+			heavy {
  				nvidia,priority = <100>;
  				nvidia,cpu-throt-level = <TEGRA_SOCTHERM_THROT_LEVEL_HIGH>;
-
-				#cooling-cells = <2>;
+				temperature = <102000>;
  			};
  		};
  	};
@@ -1136,114 +1135,84 @@ cpu-thermal {
  			polling-delay-passive = <1000>;
  			polling-delay = <0>;
- thermal-sensors =
-				<&soctherm TEGRA124_SOCTHERM_SENSOR_CPU>;
+			thermal-sensors = <&soctherm TEGRA124_SOCTHERM_SENSOR_CPU>;
trips {
-				cpu_shutdown_trip {
+				critical {
  					temperature = <105000>;
  					hysteresis = <1000>;
  					type = "critical";
  				};
- cpu_throttle_trip: throttle-trip {
+				hot {
  					temperature = <102000>;
  					hysteresis = <1000>;
  					type = "hot";
  				};
  			};
-
-			cooling-maps {
-				map0 {
-					trip = <&cpu_throttle_trip>;
-					cooling-device = <&throttle_heavy 1 1>;
-				};
-			};

If the hardware mitigation is 'heavy', don't you want to have DVFS acting before hardware throttling ?

[ ... ]

--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux