On 4/6/23 11:25, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 05/04/2023 21:47, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>> Extend the existing fan53555 driver to support the Rockchip RK860X
>> regulators.
>>
>> RK8600/RK8601 are fully compatible with FAN53555 regulators.
>>
>
>> @@ -531,6 +634,18 @@ static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused fan53555_dt_ids[] = {
>> }, {
>> .compatible = "fcs,fan53555",
>> .data = (void *)FAN53555_VENDOR_FAIRCHILD
>> + }, {
>> + .compatible = "rockchip,rk8600",
>> + .data = (void *)FAN53555_VENDOR_ROCKCHIP
>> + }, {
>> + .compatible = "rockchip,rk8601",
>> + .data = (void *)FAN53555_VENDOR_ROCKCHIP
>> + }, {
>> + .compatible = "rockchip,rk8602",
>> + .data = (void *)RK8602_VENDOR_ROCKCHIP
>> + }, {
>> + .compatible = "rockchip,rk8603",
>> + .data = (void *)RK8602_VENDOR_ROCKCHIP
>> }, {
>> .compatible = "silergy,syr827",
>> .data = (void *)FAN53555_VENDOR_SILERGY,
>> @@ -637,6 +752,18 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id fan53555_id[] = {
>> }, {
>> .name = "fan53555",
>> .driver_data = FAN53555_VENDOR_FAIRCHILD
>> + }, {
>> + .name = "rk8600",
>> + .driver_data = FAN53555_VENDOR_ROCKCHIP
>> + }, {
>> + .name = "rk8601",
>> + .driver_data = FAN53555_VENDOR_ROCKCHIP
>
> Why do you need this entry match data if it is the same as rk8600?
>
>> + }, {
>> + .name = "rk8602",
>> + .driver_data = RK8602_VENDOR_ROCKCHIP
>> + }, {
>> + .name = "rk8603",
>> + .driver_data = RK8602_VENDOR_ROCKCHIP
>
> Why do you need this entry match data if it is the same as rk8602?
This is consistent with the handling of syr827 and syr828:
.name = "syr827",
.driver_data = FAN53555_VENDOR_SILERGY
}, {
.name = "syr828",
.driver_data = FAN53555_VENDOR_SILERGY
Thanks,
Cristian
